Questions tagged [terminology]

For questions about words, phrases and definitions that are specific to proof assistants.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
5 votes
1 answer
110 views

What is a 'truncation'?

I've heard of many truncations in homotopy type theory, like propositional truncation, homotopy n-truncation, etc., and I think I understand these specific concepts. People also talk about 'double-...
user avatar
  • 4,432
4 votes
1 answer
96 views

Difference between implementation and formalisation in a proof assistant

Some authors refer to their works as "implementation of the theory in (let's say) Agda", some refer as "formalization of the theory in Agda". What is the difference between them?
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
221 views

What is a weak function space and what does it have to do with HOAS?

What is a weak function space and what does it have to do with higher order abstract syntax? I mean I know what a weak function space is. It's that thing you use for HOAS in Lambda Prolog or toolkits ...
user avatar
7 votes
2 answers
146 views

Does ST$\lambda$C equal to simple type theory?

Is "simple type theory" a folklore, or does it have a formal definition? On nlab, it's only discussed "practically": In practice any type theory is called a simple type theory if ...
user avatar
  • 4,432
9 votes
0 answers
74 views

What is focusing and how do I use it?

I have heard the term "focusing" with respect to the sequent calculus (System LK) and related calculi like the $\bar{\lambda} \mu \tilde{\mu}$-calculus. What is focusing and how do I use it? ...
user avatar
10 votes
2 answers
112 views

What's "predicative" about pC(u)IC?

Timany and Sozeau's Predicative Calculus of Cumulative Inductive Constructions (pCuIC) [1] adds extra cumulativity to the inductive types of (Lee and Werner's [2], I think?) pCIC. But what does the &...
user avatar
  • 868
11 votes
2 answers
324 views

What is a commuting conversion and why are they problematic?

Off and on I have heard of the jargon "commuting conversion" but I don't really know what it means. I've heard commuting conversions are problematic but I don't know why.
user avatar
11 votes
0 answers
297 views

What's "Swedish" style of doing type theory or proof assistants?

Jon Sterling said Conor McBride's universe polymorphism proposal to be: seems to have worked well in Swedish experiments I wonder, what does "Swedish" mean here? What kind of type theory ...
user avatar
  • 4,432
25 votes
1 answer
594 views

What is an algebraic data type?

When I first learned Haskell, I was told that you use data keyword to define an "algebraic data type", or a "sum type". Then I learned the idea ...
user avatar
  • 4,432
9 votes
1 answer
102 views

How did the meaning of "lifting" in proof assistants arise?

In topology, the notion of "lifting" has a quite a long history, starting with the theory of covering spaces, where the classic example is that if you take an outdoor spiral staircase, $S$ ...
user avatar
  • 285
3 votes
1 answer
150 views

What is an eliminator?

What is an eliminator? Are there any differences between an eliminator and an elimination form (such as $\pi_1$ and $\pi_2$ for binary products)? Does every type have exactly one? Is the type of the ...
user avatar
  • 2,509
16 votes
3 answers
390 views

What is a Proof Assistant?

How would you explain to a beginner in simple terms, what a Proof Assistant is?
user avatar
  • 1,252