Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with lean3
Search options not deleted
user 2020
Lean 3 is the previous version of the Lean theorem prover, and has an active "community" release. If using the final "official" release from 2019 (3.4.2) which is incompatible with [mathlib], make this clear in your question.
5
votes
Accepted
Are there squeeze-versions of ring and abel?
Both ring and abel produce a proof term that is going to be about as good as you could hope for from a putative squeeze_ring or squeeze_abel. This explains the suggestion from the comment to use show_ …
- 365