Questions tagged [inductive-type]

In terms of categorical semantics, an inductive type is a type whose interpretation is given by an initial algebra of an endofunctor. (from nLab)

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
0 answers
33 views

Why does Coq not allow constructor argument types to be strictly positive mutual inductive types?

Note: Apologies for the wicked mouthful of a title. I'm still getting acquainted with Coq terminology, so I might not have chosen the best words. If you have a better title suggestion, edits are more ...
Kyle Lin's user avatar
  • 143
1 vote
0 answers
43 views

Can you always replace mutually recursive references with parameters?

This is a follow up to a question someone else previously posted: Expressivity of mutual/nested inductives vs. regular inductives. pigworker answered that Adopting Agda-ish notation, the basic ...
Kyle Lin's user avatar
  • 143
2 votes
2 answers
194 views

How to reason about and extract code for inductive types with negative occurrences in Coq?

I'm interested in proving correctness of the interpreter of Appel's compiler (appendix B), and compare it to the machine semantics given by Kennedy on his paper. The interpreter acts as a denotational ...
paulotorrens's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
163 views

Co-induction principle

It's known that Nat-ind = Nat-rec ⨯ Nat-initiality Has someone figured out how to define a suitable Conat-coind such that ...
Russoul's user avatar
  • 345
1 vote
1 answer
97 views

Induction scheme on two arguments for custom type in Coq

I've been working on formalizing a Hilbert deductive system within Coq. I have the following definition for a term in first-order logic: ...
Circuit Craft's user avatar
-2 votes
2 answers
68 views

Help with strong induction

I have the following definition of divisibility by 3. ...
deleted_user0972's user avatar
6 votes
4 answers
546 views

Inductive vs. recursive definitions

In Coq there are two ways to define a new type on an inductive type: Using Inductive and using Fixpoint. What are pros and cons ...
8bc3 457f's user avatar
  • 224
2 votes
0 answers
50 views

Elimination rules of inductive types

Why does the elimination rule of inductive types sometimes allow the target type to depend on the inductive type and sometimes not? I am confused by that. Is it correct that it makes no difference in ...
Nico's user avatar
  • 712
1 vote
1 answer
60 views

Coq Induction on Hypothesis destroys the Hypothesis

I'm trying to prove something in coq I have and Inductive prop type named in_order_merge which is a relation between three lists that shows third one is in_order merge of first two, here is the ...
asha soroushpoor's user avatar
15 votes
1 answer
680 views

What are the complex induction patterns supported by Agda?

A question was recently asked on the Coq-club mailing list on Coq rejecting a nastily nested inductive type. We encountered a similar difficulty while trying to port code from Agda to Coq: Agda ...
Meven Lennon-Bertrand's user avatar
22 votes
0 answers
490 views

Categorical semantics of Agda

I would like to know the state of the art regarding the categorical semantics of the type theory implemented by Agda — or at least some approximation of that type theory that is amenable to ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 2,902
9 votes
1 answer
193 views

Strong eta-rules for functions on sum types

I am wondering whether a rule like the following is consistent with decidable conversion and type-checking for dependent type theory: $$ \frac{f\, g : (x:\mathsf{bool}) \to C~x\quad f~\mathsf{tt} \...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 2,902
5 votes
1 answer
132 views

Explain all the arguments to this rec eliminator

I defined this inductive type for representing JSON elements ...
Felipe's user avatar
  • 263
4 votes
2 answers
143 views

Pragmatic encodings of inductive inductive types

What's the most pragmatic encoding for inductive-inductive types such as for a universe of types? In pseudo Coq syntax. ...
Molly Stewart-Gallus's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
167 views

Descriptions of heterogenous datatypes

When attempting to describe the datatype as appearing in my previous question, using indexed descriptions in style of The Gentle Art of Levitation to describe this datatype (using Agda for examples): <...
Timo's user avatar
  • 517
2 votes
1 answer
386 views

(In Lean), why cannot structural recursion on propositions be used?

Update: this has been fixed and the fix is available in the latest nightly release of Lean 4. In Lean 4, structural recursion on functions on types is no issue. ...
Jozef Mikušinec's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
92 views

Inductive types associated to instances of a structure in Lean

I am using the Lean computer proof assistant. I am using the combinatorial structure of a graph with an abelian operation on its edges as a learning example. In it I have a structure Graph. I want to ...
Kind Bubble's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
111 views

Making a finite graph type in Lean - introduction rule

I'm making a finite directed graph type in Lean. I know type theory from an abstract point of view, but I'm struggling to find the way Lean would produce a type playing the role of a "finite set&...
Cayley-Hamilton's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
173 views

Why do record based inductive types with primitive projections lack an eta law?

In Coq there is ongoing work to shore up some weaknesses in subject reduction and coinductive types. Primitive projections are part of that effort for better behaviour. I get why there might be ...
Molly Stewart-Gallus's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
99 views

Can you remove strict positivity from mere propositions?

You can encode induction impredicatively. Some minimalist theories dispense entirely with inductive/coinductive types for proof irrelevant impredicative sorts. But in a practical theorem prover it's ...
Molly Stewart-Gallus's user avatar
9 votes
2 answers
727 views

Construction of inductive types "the hard way"

Most theorem provers simply axiomize inductive types (or equivalently W types) in the abstract which is fine. But I'm curious about explicit constructions of inductive types within the theory. I ...
Molly Stewart-Gallus's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
161 views

Turning off some sProp checks

In Definitional Proof Irrelevance Without K, inductives in sProp need to satisfy three conditions to allow large elimination: (1) Every non-forced argument must be in sProp. (2) The return types of ...
ionchy's user avatar
  • 906
6 votes
2 answers
222 views

How to prove in Lean that sums are distributive?

Assume we are given three types in Lean. constants A B C : Type There is a canonical map of the following form. ...
Nico's user avatar
  • 712
11 votes
2 answers
377 views

Proving uniqueness of an instance of an indexed inductive type

Consider the simple indexed inductive type Inductive Single : nat -> Set := | single_O : Single O | single_S {n} : Single n -> Single (S n). Intuitively, I ...
L. F.'s user avatar
  • 213
10 votes
2 answers
501 views

Replacing (strict) positivity with monotonicity on propositions

When defining an inductive type, there is a famous "positivity" restriction on the constructor types. For example, an inductive type $\mathsf D$ has constructor $\mathsf c : F(\mathsf D) \to ...
Trebor's user avatar
  • 3,678
6 votes
1 answer
233 views

Parameterized Datatypes in a Universe à la Tarski?

I'm wondering, is there a way to make a Universe à la Tarski that models all of the types in an open type theory, where there can be user defined parameterized inductive types? For context, I'm trying ...
Joey Eremondi's user avatar
12 votes
0 answers
152 views

Rules for mutual inductive/coinductive types

Some proof assistants, like Agda and maybe Coq, allow families of mutually defined types, or nested definitions of types, in which some are inductive and others are coinductive. I have no idea what ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 2,902
12 votes
1 answer
378 views

Is induction over mutually inductive coinductive types possible?

You can encode ordinals in Coq as Inductive ord := O | S (n: ord) | Lim (s: nat -> ord). Suppose you use the following encoding instead ...
Molly Stewart-Gallus's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
350 views

What are well-founded inductive types?

W-types are said to be "a well-founded inductive type" that is parameterized over arities and constructors, similar to a "tree of possible constructions". On nlab, it is said that ...
ice1000's user avatar
  • 5,792
16 votes
3 answers
223 views

Expressivity of mutual/nested inductives vs. regular inductives

This question is from @TaliaRinger: Are mutually inductive types and plain old inductive types equally expressive? (Say, in Coq.) I assume yes, but the motive for induction will be a huge mess. But ...
ionchy's user avatar
  • 906
2 votes
1 answer
135 views

Defining Lists and Prove Associativity of Append [closed]

When I saw this question asking what is the "Hello, World!" for proof assistants I immediately thought of that exercise. Not a long time after this answer by Couchy was proposed. Therefore, ...
Wno-all's user avatar
  • 1,078
10 votes
2 answers
170 views

Are eliminators useful in practice, or are they only useful in the metatheory?

We can derive eliminators (as functions) for inductive types and translate (structurally) recursive functions into invocations of eliminators. However, eliminators seem to be essentially recursive ...
ice1000's user avatar
  • 5,792