Skip to main content
Left closed in review as "Original close reason(s) were not resolved" by tinlyx, Guy Coder, Henry WH Hack v3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Added to review
Source Link
taylor.2317
  • 1.3k
  • 8
  • 36

After receiving responses from this question as a Liberal Artist I'm interesting in other Proof Assistant appliances, beyond Mathematics and Software Verification. I was wondering: how one can use proof assistants in roles that don't imply mathematics directly but only after some level of rigour and subtle observation at nessesarynecessary scale but different from Math top-level domain.

What I'm looking for could be:

  • Philosophy;Philosophy
  • Music;Music
  • Chemistry;Chemistry
  • Physics;Physics
  • Biology;Biology
  • Natural Language Processing;Processing
  • Poetry;Poetry
  • etc...

etc.

After receiving responses from this question as a Liberal Artist I'm interesting in other Proof Assistant appliances, beyond Mathematics and Software Verification. I was wondering: how one can use proof assistants in roles that don't imply mathematics directly but only after some level of rigour and subtle observation at nessesary scale but different from Math top-level domain.

What I'm looking could be:

  • Philosophy;
  • Music;
  • Chemistry;
  • Physics;
  • Biology;
  • Natural Language Processing;
  • Poetry;

etc.

After receiving responses from this question as a Liberal Artist I'm interesting in other Proof Assistant appliances, beyond Mathematics and Software Verification. I was wondering: how one can use proof assistants in roles that don't imply mathematics directly but only after some level of rigour and subtle observation at necessary scale but different from Math top-level domain.

What I'm looking for could be:

  • Philosophy
  • Music
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Biology
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Poetry
  • etc...
Left closed in review as "Original close reason(s) were not resolved" by It'sNotALie., tinlyx, Nike Dattani
Post Closed as "Needs more focus" by Mike Shulman, Henry WH Hack v3.0, Guy Coder, Big Brother, Glorfindel

Can we use Proof Assistants boyondbeyond mathematics?

added 10 characters in body
Source Link
Namdak Tönpa
  • 1.3k
  • 7
  • 26

After receiving responses from this question as a Liberal Artist I'm interesting in other Proof Assistant appliances, beyond Mathematics and Software Verification. I was wondering: how one can use proof assistants in roles that don't imply mathematics directly but only after some level of rigour and subtle observation at nessesary scale but different from Math top-level domain.

What I'm looking could be:

  • Philosophy;
  • Music;
  • Chemistry;
  • Physics;
  • Biology;
  • Natural Language Processing;
  • Poetry;

etc.

After receiving responses from this question as a Liberal Artist I'm interesting in other Proof Assistant appliances, beyond Mathematics and Software Verification. I was wondering: how one can use proof assistants in roles that don't imply mathematics directly but only after some level of rigour and subtle observation at nessesary scale but different from Math domain.

What I'm looking could be:

  • Philosophy;
  • Music;
  • Chemistry;
  • Physics;
  • Biology;
  • Natural Language Processing;

etc.

After receiving responses from this question as a Liberal Artist I'm interesting in other Proof Assistant appliances, beyond Mathematics and Software Verification. I was wondering: how one can use proof assistants in roles that don't imply mathematics directly but only after some level of rigour and subtle observation at nessesary scale but different from Math top-level domain.

What I'm looking could be:

  • Philosophy;
  • Music;
  • Chemistry;
  • Physics;
  • Biology;
  • Natural Language Processing;
  • Poetry;

etc.

added 243 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Namdak Tönpa
  • 1.3k
  • 7
  • 26
Loading
Source Link
taylor.2317
  • 1.3k
  • 8
  • 36
Loading